Stakeholders Analysis

HOME | ACTION PLAN | EDUCATION PLANNING | NUTRITION IN GUATEMALA | STAKEHOLDERS ANALYSIS | PROPOSED NEEDSSUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE | COLD CLIMATE FRUIT TREES | STRAWBERRY PRODUCTION | PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS

Stakeholders Analysis

Stakeholder
Groups
Interests at Stake in relation to project Effect of project on interests
-O+
Stakeholder
importance for project success: U,1,2,3,4,5
Degree of influence of stakeholder: U,1,2,3,4,5
San Pablo Parents Improved health of children ? 5 5
Nutrition Education +
Community Togetherness ?
San Pablo Children Improved Health ?
5 3
Decreased dental caries? ?
Decreased DMII? ?
Nutrition Education +

San Pablo Farmers


New Crops +/- 5 5
Revenue +
Increased knowledge of ag practices +
Entire Community Revenue + 3 5
Community Business/Jobs +
Decreased Health costs +
Save $ on food +
Community togetherness ?

Las Mujeres


Improved Health of Children ? 5 5
Increased Fruit Consumption +
Time with children ?
Women’s equality – shift in gender roles ?

Community Greenhouse Participants

Expand Greenhouse + 5 3
Add educational programs +
Increased awareness of ag practices +
Our Group Cultural Awareness + 3
2
Practical application of knowledge in our various fields +
Good Grade +
StageinProject
Process
Type of Participation
Communication
(1 wayflow)
Consultation
(2 wayflow)
Collaboration (increasingcontrolover decisionmaking) Empowerment
(controltransferfor decisionsand resources)
Identification LM, CG, SPP, SPF LM, CG, SPP, SPF LM, CG, SPP, SPF
Stakeholder
Influence
Importance of Stakeholder for success of project
Unknown None 1 2 3 4 Great 5 Preparationand
Appraisal
LM, CG, SPP, SPF, SPC LM, CG, SPP, SPF, SPC LM, CG, SPP, SPF, SPC
Unknown
Implementation LM, CG, SPP, SPF, SPC LM, CG, SPP, SPF, SPC LM, CG, SPP, SPF, SPC
None1



2 Our Group
Supervision and
Monitoring
LM, CG, SPP, SPF LM, CG, SPP, SPF LM, CG, SPP, SPF
3 SPC, CGP
4 Evaluation All All LM, CG, SPP, SPF
Great5 EC
SPP, SPF, LM